Creepy Crowley

Aleister Crowley: Magick, Rock and Roll, and the Wickedest Man in the World
Gary Lachman
Tarcher, 2014
N0n-fiction 387 pages

In my youth I briefly dabbled in occult musings. I blame Hermann Hesse for introducing me to the god Abraxas in his book, “Demian”. On a visit to an occult bookstore I purchased, and subsequently read, Aleister Crowley’s novel, “Moonchild”. Hesse’s novel impressed me more favorably and I didn’t give Mr. Crowley much thought over the years.

Not until I encountered his name on a plaque along the shore in Cascais. His name was the only two words I understood on the plaque. All the other words were in Portuguese. I was intrigued. In 1930, Crowley faked his suicide in 1930 at the nearby Hell’s Mouth (Boca do Inferno) aided by the poet Fernando Pessoa.

The following day I visited the Quinta da Regaleira. The garden’s buildings were constructed between 1904 and 1910.

It is believed that Templar initiations at Quinta da Regaleira began with candidates entering one of the Initiation Wells blindfolded. Holding a sword close to their heart, they would descend nine flights of stairs – a number that represents the nine founders of the Templar order.

Was it coincidence that I encountered Aleister Crowley a day prior to descending the Initiation Well? Do I detect Crowley’s influence? No. António Augusto Carvalho Monteiro who owned the well died in 1920, ten years before Crowley arrived in nearby Cascais.

Gary Lachman also encountered Crowley in his youth. His bandmates were also intrigued with occult and mystical topics, “ Debbie, the singer, was interested in UFOs, and after rehearsals she often consulted the I Ching about the next band move. Lachman subsequently quit Blondie and began writing full time.

Aleister Crowley is a prickly subject and the more I read about him the less I liked him. His titles, “Beast 666”, and “Wickedest man in the world” were self-conferred, as were some of the mystical degrees he claimed. Whether he was actually as wicked as he claimed to be can be debated. Sodomy is no longer illegal as it was during his day. But I draw the line at eating feces. It’s may not be wicked, but it’s certainly repellant.

Crowley began his magical career as an initiate in the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. W. B. Yeats was also a member, though Crowley considered himself the greater poet.

Ultimately, Crowley’s thirst for power helped fuel the schisms which ended the Golden Dawn. In later years, Crowley created his own magical practices and beliefs. Who can say if those practices were effective, but Crowley did manage to cultivate many zealous followers and many hefty unpaid debts.

Lachman comments on Crowley’s driving principal:

To side with the devil for the sake of the spiritual seems odd. But Crowley’s spirituality is of the antinomian school; it embraces the idea that the spiritually awakened person is no longer subject to laws, is, indeed, “beyond good and evil.”

I consider this belief erroneous. Spiritually advanced people have no need to show that they are beyond conventional morality. Much of Crowley’s wickedness was showmanship and braggadocio. His accomplishments? Hard to evaluate. Yet he has not gone away. Many rock and rap performers have cultivated Crowleyisms, but that’s only natural. Showmanship and braggadocio are tools pop performers frequently wield.

A naughty child runs amok

Since beginning his second term, Donald Trump crossed the line into unacceptable legal and behavioral territory on multiple occasions. But his supporters weren’t watching that border. Instead they moved the line.

That has to stop. The line can’t move any further.

On January 18, Trump texted Norway’s prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre:

“Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

Consider:

1. 1 Norway’s government does not select Nobel winners.
2. 2 Trump desires Greenland which belongs to Denmark, not Norway.
3. 3 Trump admits he wasn’t thinking solely about the good of the United States while coveting the Nobel Prize.

Trump’s thoughts were for himself. He thought of peace because he wanted a prize. He acted like a naughty child feigning goodness to avoid being put on Santa’s shit list. Just as the child becomes naughty again once Christmas passes, Trump feels no, “obligation to think purely of Peace.” after not winning the Nobel Peace Prize. These words alone reveal Trump’s character. A leader who puts his own interests before his country’s is unfit to lead. He’s crossed one line too many and now lawmakers need to restrain him from acting harmfully or remove him from office. So far, most members of the majority party have been unwilling to hold him accountable for his actions and international threats.

A few days later, Trump spoke about Greenland at Davos:

So, we want a piece of ice for world protection. And they won't give it. We've never asked for anything else, and we could have kept that piece of land, and we didn't. So,they have a choice. You can say ‘yes ‘and we will be very appreciative, or you can say ‘no’ and we will remember. A strong and secure America means a strong NATO, and that's one reason why I'm working every day to ensure our military is very powerful.

He’s mistaken. Greenland was never ours to keep. The oil in Venezuela never belonged to us either, but Trump’s claiming that it did helped him justify illegal attacks on that country and its citizens. Some legal experts consider those attacks murder, and therefore the president is a murderer.

When NATO was formed in 1949 its mission was to protect the national sovereignty of its members. If one member country were attacked, other member countries would help defend it. The United States already has a military presence in Greenland and can enlarge that presence should need arise. We don’t need to own Greenland to defend it, nor do Greenlanders wish to be governed by the United States. Denmark, which owns Greenland, won’t sell it to us. Trump’s tough stance caused consternation among Davos meeting attendees and European leaders. By day’s end, Trump had backed off saying he’d achieved a concept of an agreement. But this didn’t erase the damage he’d done. European leaders mobilized both to oppose and mollify Trump. His position convinces many Europeans that their long-standing ally is no longer trustworthy.

But Trump hasn’t just damaged our international relations. Here in the USA, ICE agents killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti. Administration spokespeople and other ICE fans claimed that Good brought her death upon herself. After ICE killed Alex Pretti the administration was quick to label him a domestic terrorist, claiming the ICE agents who killed him were merely defending themselves. Camera and phone video show the administration’s story is false. As Chico Marx once said, “Well, who ya gonna believe, me or your own eyes?” I believe my eyes.

Although over two dozen Republican law makers expressed their displeasure with ICE, far too few have done so. There are 218 Republicans in the House of Representatives alone. More need to speak up to offset President Trump’s bad behavior.

President Trump made 30,573 misleading or false statements during his first term the Washington Post reported. That’s a lot of lies. Since then, lying has gone viral. Many politicians lie frequently now. Lying in the service of power is replacing power in the service of the public good.

Recent journalism shows that Homeland Security uses neo-Nazi dog whistles to recruit ICE agents. Are we becoming a racist nation? Just the other day Donald Trump said that the upcoming mid-term election should be placed under federal control in at least 15 states. The Constitution allows the states primary authority in conducting elections, while Congress may make secondary modifications such as choosing a national election day for all states. The president has no authority here. But the Constitution hasn’t stopped Trump from usurping Congressional authority in other instances. Federalizing elections under Republican supervision is a sure fire way to rig them. It would invalidate the Constitution, just as invading Greenland would invalidate NATO. Does our nation no longer respect its agreements and laws?

I believe Donald Trump should either be restrained from acting outside norms or removed from office. This would be best for the country, but it is not an easy thing to do. It would require a change of heart from a majority of Republicans. They would need to realize that cooperation excels rivalry in solving problems, and this goes against their competitive nature.

It’s a shame our country has political parties at all, but the two who hold the majority have ceased to function cooperatively. Without cooperation little gets done as much gets destroyed. Something – an invasion from space – or something else needs to jar us into cooperating. What’s going on now isn’t working.

Finding job satisfaction while unemployed

 Dear Senator;

I'm sorry you lost your job responsibilities. But you allowed it to happen. First you said nothing while DOGE fired hundreds of government employees. Now that the government is unfunded, the president is firing even more. You abandoned your right to control the purse strings. It's no wonder the Democrats haven't budged on the shutdown: they can't be certain that the money they voted to spend will actually be spent. Firing employees saves money, but it also keeps government services from being provided. Citizens suffer when governments stop providing services.

You currently control both houses of congress as well as the executive branch. And you've wasted this opportunity by allowing the president to rule by his whims instead of by respecting constitutional norms. Since you have the power, why don't you use it instead of handing it over to the executive branch without a whimper of resistance? 

By doing nothing, what gets damaged? Only the very integrity and authority of the Constitution itself. Earlier in October, the president informed Congress that the United States is at war. Only Congress, not the president, has authority to declare a war, yet you've remained silent as Trump usurps your authority. Worse than silent, in fact. When Democrats put forth a measure to block the president from sinking boats in the Caribbean Sea, the Republicans blocked it. Rand Paul was one of the only two Republican senators supporting the measure. He wondered why we sank boats instead of intercepting them, “If anyone gave a you-know-what about justice, perhaps those in charge of deciding whom to kill might let us know their names, present proof of their guilt and show evidence of their crimes.”

You know even less than names and evidence. You only have the presidents statements that he's going after drug smuggling terrorists. The problem is Venezuela plays a minimal role as a source of smuggled drugs. So why is Trump really sinking Venezuelan boats? Some argue that the president is trying to unseat Nicolás Maduro from power. So why doesn't he say so? Moreover why can't you be bothered to find out what his illegally declared war is really about?

It's a shame that flights are cancelled and delayed because unpaid flight traffic controllers call in sick. You senators do the least you can to end the shutdown while continuing to draw your salaries. Perhaps you should be investigated for impersonating lawmakers.

Quiet quitters of Congress

 Dear Representative;

On three occasions this September, President Trump authorized the sinking of Venezuelan boats. No evidence of drug smuggling was provided. There were no survivors.  In years past we've arrested and prosecuted smugglers, not sunk their boats. Guilt is established in law courts, not by lynch mobs or presidents. Our government has never before behaved like this. America can't be great again by doing what it's never done before. Killing untried alleged foreign criminals is not justice. — It's an act of warfare. Only Congress has the authority to declare war, yet Trump has silently declared war just as you have remained silent instead of confronting him. An unauthorized act of war is essentially murder. By not restraining President Trump, Congress becomes accomplices to murder.

You've also authorized spending and then allowed Trump to withhold it. Only Congress can declare war. Only Congress controls the purse strings. Although you've taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, you've sat by idly when it was violated. Failing to uphold your oath demonstrates an absence of patriotism and a surfeit of self-serving greed. Don't allow your president to bend laws. Either step up or step down.   

The “radical left” left

When Charlie Kirk was killed in Utah, Donald Trump blamed it on the “radical left”. He blames the radical left for other things too.

During the week Kirk was killed I heard an episode of “Today Explained.” In this Episode, “Trump’s chief culture warrior”, Noel King interviewed Christopher Rufo author of the book, “America's Cultural Revolution: How the Radical Left Conquered Everything.”

Everything conquered, Wow! So just who is the radical left? In his interview, Rufo talked about the Smithsonian and other institutions. They have been, “totally captured by left winged ideologies.”

Trans-genderism is an ideology according to Rufo – I consider it more of an identity, but Rufo insists. Historically, native American groups acknowledged three to five sexual identities or roles. Rufo insists there are only two sexes. However, different cultures have different views of such things.

Rufo also insists that that there are agreed upon aesthetic standards and that polemical art fails to meet those standards. Todays museums are “curators of anti-cultural nihilism” instead of acceptable art. While some say art can be political or have subjective appeal, Rufo claims this is not the case. Adolf Hitler had personal standards for acceptable art and imposed them on his fellow Germans. Perhaps Rufo would also like to do this.

 In his book, Rufo claims that Herbert Marcuse promoted a plan for covertly indoctrinating the masses in socialist ideology. I was still in high school when Marcuse did this. That was more than five decades ago. I asked some lefties I know. Two had heard of Marcuse – none knew anything about him or his ideas. None had ever heard a college professor mention his name. However, the right leaning Cato institute mentions him in several of its articles. Apparently Cato considers his ideas a threat, or perhaps they’re enamored with his covert indoctrination plan.

I have a different theory. The radical left was a fringe movement during the 1960s and 1970s. They are no longer even that. No Democratic president since Lyndon Johnson has promoted policies to the left of his. In fact, Americans have been shifting to the right for half a century now. The radical left has left. They’ve marched off into a black hole. They’re so rare now that they can be considered cyrtids like Big Foot or Nessie. Some report seeing them, but there’s little proof that they actually exist.

Except in the minds of right-winged thinkers including Christopher Rufo and the Cato Institute.

 Most Americans support Social Security and Medicare, yet both have been linked to socialism. Neither Social Security or Medicare meet actual definitions of socialism yet that hasn’t stopped some from so maligning those programs. Similarly, not all on the left can be considered radical. Few, in fact, can be. Yet that doesn’t stop some voices from demonizing imaginary enemies. This does great harm because it stifles the free expression of different views and useful dialogues. When all must think the same and blame imaginary enemies, social progress ceases. Dirty tricks beget soiled and spoiled societies.

As long as we do politics by blaming instead of cooperating we progress toward an Orwellian society.

  

Dear Representative:

If I told you to jump off a cliff you wouldn't do it — so why are you willing to jump off a (fiscal) cliff when Donald Trump tells you to? The dollar's value has dropped this year to an extent not seen in over 50 years. This will greatly increase the cost and difficulty of servicing our enormous national debt. And yet Congress is considering a Bad Bullshit Bill that will increase the deficit by 3.3 trillion dollars. There's no hiding this no matter how much magical math is used.

And speaking of magic — you argued on three prior occasions that tax breaks for the wealthy get pissed down the social ladder to rain abundance on average Joes. It didn't happen then. It won't happen now. Maybe you should stick with facts and logic instead of misinformation when you argue your points. We've known this was a lie for 40 years. If you pass this bill your voters will know as well. And then you'll get voted out of office — perhaps even ridden out of town on a rail. Good luck with all that.

Sincerely,

Voters with open eyes.

If you don’t like how things are going, contact your Congress person and Senator.

Robin Hood and the King

Reverse Robin Hood
According to legend, Robin Hood robbed the wealthy and distributed booty to the poor. Robin Hood in reverse (RHR) works differently. This method is favored by kleptocrats and oligarchs and seeks to enhance the holdings of the wealthiest at the expense of the most impoverished. Let’s talk about the tax bill now approaching the Senate. Read to the end where I unveil its poison pill.

Like the tax bill of 2017, this one also holds out the promise that money will trickle down to those who can use it more. And also like that bill, it puts more money in the hands of those who don’t really need it.

The big difference this time around is that the national debt has ballooned since 2017. This time lawmakers are looking at offsets. They’re considering cuts in programs for people who need them to pay for tax breaks for the wealthy.

For years Republicans have complained about taxes while the government spent. Somebody needs to pay to run the government but magical thinkers believe that tax cuts pay for themselves by invoking some vague and implausible principal. It never happens.

Meanwhile the government continues to borrow as the cost of doing so is becoming unwieldy. Moody’s recently downgraded the country’s credit worthiness. This hurts our nations’s reputation and increases our borrowing costs.

During Eisenhower’s days the highest marginal tax rate was 91 percent. It’s much less now. If the wealthy could tolerate high taxes back then, why can’t they help lower the deficit now? Our current lawmakers will never willingly ask the wealthy to pay their fair share.

The King
The tax bill contains a clause which reads: “No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued.”

This is intended to prevent federal courts from from imposing consequences for contempt of court on top government officials. It would give Donald Trump king-like immunity for violating the Constitution. Though perhaps it's unreasonable to suggest that a twice impeached convicted felon would ever think about violating the Constitution.

If you don’t like how things are going contact your Congress person and Senator.

Two quick reads

Merge and Disciple: Two Short Novels (From Crosstown to Oblivion) Kindle Edition
Walter Mosley
Fiction 243 pages
Tor Books, 2012

Like Jumpnauts, these two short novels are concerned with what might occur if humans encountered an awarness greater than their own. In all three works the consequences are planet changing but the stories themselves are very different.

Walter Mosley is best known for his crime and detective fiction. His heroes, Easy Rawlins, King Oliver, and others walk the thin edge that separates morality from immorality. Mosley heroes are driven by moral considerations and behavior, and that’s just as true for the protagonists in Merge and Disciple. These two works, are science fiction in the best sense, but they also waft a bit of eau de detective noir. Mosley’s characters passage between mundane and enhanced consciousness is tempered with violence, pain and uncertainty. Fair warning: graphic sexual scenes may be disturbing to those more used to traditional vanilla science fiction.

Mosley writes in contemporary style, but  with sufficient lyricality to lift his prose above the commonplace. In his book, This Year You Write Your Novel, he stresses that those wanting to write prose fiction should first become familiar with poetry. “Of all writing, the discipline in poetry is the most demanding. You have to learn how to distill what you mean into the most economic and at the same time the most elegant and accurate language.” Mosley has the skills to use words with economy, fitness and purpose.

From Merge: “You killed me,” I said with no emotion, vibration, or intention. “That’s like a table complaining about being dusted,” she said, “a sheet worrying about being hung out to dry.”

From Disciple: Nothing is as it seems, friend Hogarth. Nothing in the world that human beings believe in is really what exists. There was no primal atom, no Big Bang. There is no space as such. Life is not unique. There is no Not God.

Uniformity, inequity and exclusivity

Get the button

On a recent weekend, Elon Musk’s henchmen made an "unprecedented and breathtakingly broad incursion into, and accessing of, closely held U.S. government systems and data involving millions of Americans." Donald Trump is kicking doors down fast and it seems no one cares or does much about it. 

I've shared my views with Congressmen and Senators on a good few occasions. But recently  when a friend asked me to contact my representatives I was reluctant to do so. These days I feel like no one is listening, or if they're listening, they're failing to act.  I asked why should I bother to contact my representatives when they won't listen? In the end, I made the calls. An intern for one of my representatives assured me that she was listening. But I fear other people's representatives are not. They like what the administration does and so do their constituents.

Trump ignores rules and foregoes established procedures and lawmakers don't challenge him. He attempts to revoke birthright citizenship, is brutal with immigrants, and claims that merit should substitute for diversity, equity and inclusion. In his world, merit is something white men have and sometimes loan to white women. In his world, non-white candidates only get hired when standards are purposely lowered, never because of merit.

Trump has banned all reference to DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) in government agencies and ended DEI initiatives.  Several sources have suggested that DEI training may not always achieve its ends. In 2016, the Harvard Business Review reported that some DEI efforts have actually worsened workplace equality. Those who voluntarily engage in diversity training shift their views, while those who feel forced into training may harden their views against it. Engaging workers to promote diversity works well, while coercing them to do so worsens workplace equity.

So does that mean we should do away with DEI entirely? I don't think so. One can't change a person who doesn't want to change, but other people seek out self-improvement, and a best means of self-improvement is learning and challenging one's biases. The current effort to do away with DEI really promotes a hidden message. That message is that a certain group of people — white men — has traditionally held the most power in the USA and should continue to do so —  especially if it keeps others from enjoying the same comforts and privileges.

This message ignores that American values represent those of a conglomerate of peoples and cultures. An America that becomes uniform, inequitable and exclusive is not an America in which most Americans will thrive. It's not the America I want. Do you?

Visitations

Jumpnauts: A Novel (Folding Universe)
S&S/Saga Press  2024
Fiction 367 pages
Hao Jingfang
Ken Liu (Translator)

In the not too distant future two factions engage in unending combat over which will control the world. One protagonist is the son of a wealthy business family. Another has devoted his career to the military. Like today, factions struggle to increase their wealth and power.

An archeologist’s daughter holds the key to meeting the aliens who’ve visited our planet every 700 years for the past several thousand. Others become interested, including the two enemy protagonists, and a ship is launched to rendezvous with the aliens.

This setup could begin an average science fiction story, but Jumpnauts is more than an average story. First, the character development is excellent. The characters have rich histories and conflicts to confront and resolve.

Second, the story references classic Chinese philosophy and ancient mythology comes alive as the story unfolds.

Third, it takes a new approach. Telepathy has long figured in science fiction, but in this case, it pays homage, if only in passing, to information theory.

The Paranormal Ranger: A chilling memoir of investigations into the paranormal in Navajoland
William Morrow 2024
Fiction 282 pages
Stanley Milford, Jr.

Telepathy is not addressed in The Paranormal Ranger, but other strange phenomena are. These include, UFOs, hauntings, sasquatch, witchcraft and skinwalkers. Navajoland covers more than 27 thousand square miles and overlaps three states. It’s a harsh, sparely populated land – the sort of land where one might find paranormal happenings, if one were to find them at all. Stanley Milford, Jr. worked decades as a ranger on this land. During this time he and his partner became leading investigators of odd and troubling phenomena. Sometimes their investigations uncovered mundane explanations, but other investigations led only to the inexplicable. This is an easily consumed memoir from a man dedicated to resolving conflicts and unburdening worried citizens.

Like Jumpnauts this book also discusses the possibility that Earth may have been visited by interstellar travelers in its past. While the science fiction novel is lite on details, the memoir provides details of alien visitations through Navajo origin stories and ancient rock depictions of star people. It also provide a glimpse into Navajo culture and its traditional tales.

Stolen lyrics

The Beatles 1968 hit, "Revolution," peaked at 12 on the Billboard Top 100. Until recently, few knew that they actually plagiarized the tune and changed the lyrics of a song originally performed by a Mersey dockside band aboard a German submarine converted into a coffee house by the drummer's mother.

When the song was finally released in 1969, the Beatles sued the band into oblivion and all known copies of the 45 were destroyed.

This is that song:

Reservation

by John Lemon and Paul McCaroni

You say you have a reservation
Well, you know
We all like a pricey meal

You tell me that it's discrimination
Well, you know
You should have worn a power tie

But when you talk about instruction
Don't imply that I don't know my job
Don't you know you're gonna wait so long

So long
So long

You say I'm stiffer than old Mr. Brann
Well, you know
Chef might strike you with a frying pan

You threaten me with retribution
Well, you know
You should tip me with more money, man

But if you offer money so you don't have to wait
All I can tell you is dinner is going to be late
Don't you know you're gonna wait so long

So long
So long

You say waiting gives you constipation
Well, you know
We all want to get you fed
You tell me that the bar's way too loud
Well, you know

It's better
drinking in a crowd
But if go asking for carry out menus now
You deserve to eat fast food anyhow
Don't you know you're gonna wait so long

So long
So long
So long, so long
So long, so long
So long, so long
  

Weird

I have rarely, if ever, been more moved by a movie then I was by "Weird, the Al Yankovic Story." Daniel Radcliffe, an actor formerly featured in a string of low budget movies about a boarding school for deviants called Pigpimples, or something, stars in his greatest, and career defining, role as American rock superstar, Weird Al Yankovic. The story traces Yankovic's strange and troubled youth to his rise as America's most celebrated musician.

In one early scene, Yankovic is invited to a party hosted by world famous disc jockey, Dr. Demento. The party is crashed by wannabe famous DJ, Wolfman Jack. Bassist, John Deacon, begs Yankovic to write a parody of one of Queen's songs, "Another One Rides the Bus." Andy Warhol, however remarks to fellow artist, Salvador Dali, that Yankovic's fame will last about fifteen minutes. Also in attendance at Demento's party are offbeat musicians, Frank Zappa and Alice Cooper.

Perhaps you wonder why I waited until two years after its release before reviewing this dramatic gem. As a member of the downtrodden proletarian class. I eschew movie theaters. Instead, I waited until the movie was available through Kanopy, a streaming service provided through a socialist institution called a public library.

Be advised however, that this is a serious drama rather than a mere parody of a rise-to-fame rock movie, or a decline-to-obscurity rock movie such as, "This is Spinal Tap." I give "Weird" a rarely awarded eleven.

Enough. Stop.

In its war with Hamas, Israel has killed thousands of Gaza residents, many of those noncombatants. Today more thousands in Lebanon and Syria were injured when Hezbollah pagers simultaneously exploded. This latest aggression is pure atrocity. Israel has the right to defend itself, certainly, but not like this. Innocent children are among the few known so far to have died.

If a UN resolution calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the United States should vote in its favor. It should also stop supplying Israel with weapons. Every time innocents die in Gaza, Israel claims it was targeting Hamas. That excuse is no longer believable. Hezbollah used pagers because Israel was too good at hacking their phones. This along with the technical prowess  required to explode pagers on command make me wonder why Israel can't target Hamas without killing innocents as well. Does Israel really care about which Palestinians they kill? It should because the world is watching and thinking that its violent excess must stop.

In Biblical times the Jews made a covenant with God to uphold His laws. One of those laws is, "Thou shalt not kill." Israel no longer keeps its ancient covenant. I am appalled that a people would break its promise to God. Perhaps Israel will come to its senses. Perhaps it can still seek peace. I will pray.

Nine clouds and an illusion

The Nine Cloud Dream (Kuunmong)
Penguin Classics 2019
Fiction 288 pages
Kim Man-jung
Heinz Insu Fenkl (Editor, Introduction, Translator)

Serious spoiler alert. The cheapest writer’s trick ever is telling a tale and then revealing it to was all a dream. Yet the author gets away with it by using reincarnation to obscure his intention.  Toward the end of the novel he introduces the sage who dreamt he was a butterfly and wakes wondering if he is now a butterfly dreaming it is a sage. One questions what is real and what is illusion. The story is fantastical. A master sends a young monk to Hell and then the reborn monk sets off as a poor scholar. Along the way he finds good luck and meets women he promises to reunite with. Eventually he becomes an adopted prince and takes those nine women as wives and concubines. Then in his mature years he becomes disillusioned and seeks an ancient master for instruction. He must now confront the realization that what appears real is actually illusion.

As the hero woos women with poetry and engages in fantastic feats of warfare and diplomacy the reader eagerly comes along. This rags to riches story entices readers until their “suspension of disbelief” hits the inevitable surprise promised by the title.  This drives home the point that we are all victims of the illusions we experience.

Kim Man-jung’s story, Kuunmong, takes place in Chinese and is written in Chinese. Author, Kim Man-jung himself resided in Korea and was active in the royal court. Some scholars believe the Kuunmong was published in 1789, though other scholars question that date.

Collateral damage

The 1968 Democratic convention is remembered for the violence that Chicago’s police unleashed upon Vietnam War protesters. In statements before this year’s Democratic convention, Chicago officials have forsworn a violent response to war protest, but not overruled arrests if protesters break laws. Nobody wants a repeat of 1968, yet sizable protests are expected.

Protest issues at the Republican convention included, the war in Gaza, immigration, reproductive rights, and a perceived racist agenda. Protests at the Democratic convention will largely target the Gaza war. Some feel that the current administration has done too little to confront Israel’s aggressive tactics in Gaza and elsewhere. This obscures the truth. Both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have confronted Israel verbally — its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has deflected those criticisms. What can one do when an ally refuses to listen? Continue supplying it arms?

Sadly, the administration’s options are hampered by decades of US support for Israel. Since many Democrats and most Republicans support Israel, strong criticism of that country would be political suicide for a leader who does so.

When people are secure in their beliefs, those beliefs can be rubbish and still go unchallenged. International bodies have condemned Israel for allowing settlement in occupied territory, but the United States says little about the matter. Knowing it has a strong ally, Israel ignores such international criticisms and permits settler lawlessness. This is bad enough but Israel now uses tactics that many countries are calling genocidal. Many here believe in Israel’s “right to defend itself” and ignore the reality that Israel’s actions go well beyond self-defense and decency. The belligerent statements by some Israeli leaders demonstrate an unwillingness to pursue peace.

Israel has long said that its Palestinian enemies use citizens as “human shields” and there may be some truth in that. However, this doesn’t grant Israel license to attack schools, hospitals, aid convoys and refugee camps. For Israel, finding Hamas militants is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Hamas is the needle and innocent civilians are the haystack. Israel destroys haystacks to find needles. Benjamin Netanyahu’s stated intent is to eliminate Hamas. Perhaps he could do so, but he can’t erase memories. As long as Palestinians remain so, too, will remain those who seek vengeance. Groups like Hamas will form again and the violence will continue. Hamas, or its ideas, can’t be destroyed without either genocide or the utter subjugation of Palestinian citizens. Neither is a viable solution.

Israel’s current behavior cannot continue if the Middle East is to remain relatively peaceful. As long as Israel has a powerful ally willing to bring aircraft carriers into its region to discourage escalation, Israel has little incentive for peace. Pro-Palestinian protests at the Democratic convention may focus unearned blame on Democrats. This could help Republicans win in November and continue enabling Israel’s bad behavior. Regardless of which party wins, unless our leaders forcefully demand peace by withholding arms and assistance, our country may drawn into a vicious Middle East war.

 

 

 

Get real

 

I admit it. I’m fond of fake news and loathe looking at reality. By “reality” I mean the world described by an unidentified White House aide in 2004. Ron Suskind wrote in The New YorkTimes:

“The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based community,’ which he defined as people who ‘believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.’ I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ‘That's not the way the world really works anymore,’ he continued. ‘We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.’"

While some consider news in media organizations like The New York Times, The Washington Post, NPR and the BBC to be fake, I consider them to be reality based and factual. Since news is reported similarly by different such “fake news” organizations, I can’t believe that their news is untrue. There are too many organizations are involved to sustain a conspiracy. Further, these organizations identify their information sources and attempt to present all sides of various issues.

Ron Suskind’s article addressed a faith based presidential administration. He wrote:

“The faith-based presidency is a with-us-or-against-us model that has been enormously effective at, among other things, keeping the workings and temperament of the Bush White House a kind of state secret.”

Suskind did not call it an untruthful administration, but in retrospect it is now known that the United States declared war on Iraq over weapons of mass destruction that were never proven or found. When her husband presented a fact-based correction, CIA agent, Valerie Plame's covert identity was revealed by someone in the Bush administration. This after-the-fact action can only be seen as pure spitefulness.

I have no problem with having faith, as long as that faith is tempered with facts and logic — however the Bush administration wasn’t tarnished by the president’s faith, but by its lack of truthfulness.

The Washington Post claims Donald Trump lied to or misled the public over 30,000 times during his four years as president.That kind of untruthfulness sets a bad example for like-minded partisans. During the recent Republican convention speakers fibbed freely. Here are some examples:

On the opening night of the Republican National Convention, Nikki Haley said of Democrats, “They want massive tax hikes on working families.” In reality, Biden’s tax proposals would increase taxes on the top one percent of earners not on the majority of earners who earn far less. Those who would receive the higher tax burden make up the same one percent of earners who benefited from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

On the second day Kari Lake said of her opponent, “Just last week, Ruben Gallego voted to let the millions of people who poured into our country illegally cast a ballet in this upcoming election.” Gallego had voted against a law that would require proof of citizenship when registering to vote. Such a bill would create obstacles to voter registration for many potential voters. Proving citizenship would likely require a birth certificate, a document few keep handy, should they actually own a copy. Immigrants who become naturalized citizens receive certificates of citizenship. Those born here do not.

It is illegal for non-citizens to vote and there is sparse evidence of immigrants risking deportation by doing so, yet Ted Cruz claimed that illegal immigration, “happened because Democrats cynically decided they wanted votes from illegals more than they wanted to protect our children.” Cruz provided no supporting evidence for this claim, perhaps because there isn’t any.

On the convention’s third day, JD Vance said, “Joe Biden is willing to buy energy from tinpot dictators but not hard-working Americans right here at home.” The New York Times labeled this statement false adding that a record breaking amount of crude oil was produced here in 2023. 

I could provide more examples but instead I’d like to return to the idea that a lying leader encourages others to lie as well. Exaggerated claims have long played a part in politics, but the current trend of speaking outright lies instead of facts is new to this country. It’s dangerous to think that when an empire acts it creates its own reality. Such thinking ignores external realities such as climate change or foreign wars. Totalitarian regimes try to control what information their peoples receive. Do Republicans seek totalitarianism?

On July 27, Donald Trump, after noting that Christians are, “not big voters,” said,

“Christians, get out and vote. Just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore, you know what? Four more years, it’ll be fixed, it’ll be fine, you won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.”

His campaign spokesman, Steven Cheung, explained,

 “President Trump was talking about uniting this country and bringing prosperity to every American, as opposed to the divisive political environment that has sowed so much division and even resulted in an assassination attempt.”

As far as that goes: 1) Trump’s economic plan of high tariffs and tax cuts for the rich would make life miserable for average Americans, 2) The FBI hasn’t established a motive, so the assumption that divisive politics resulted in an assassination attempt isn’t justified, 3) about that divisiveness … Most of the name calling has come from the right, not the left, so how exactly does Trump and his party plan to unite the country? Calling Democrats ‘Communists’ and immigrants ’rapists’ is both untruthful and unjustified. Name calling can’t promote unity.

Outfoxed

The Fox Wife: A Novel
Yangsze Choo
Fiction 392 pages
Henry Holt and Co., Press, 2024

“There are as many kinds of foxes as there are types of people. Some are criminals. Others seek to escape this world by refining themselves.”

“The Fox Wife” is told through two perspectives. First person narration comes through a female fox out for revenge, while an elderly detective’s attempts to solve a complex mystery are told through the third person. The chapters alternate, first one told in first person followed by the next in the third person. It works.

 I’ve had difficulty reading stories in which the main characters alternate. An interesting chapter can be followed by a dull one that ruins the effect of the first. But if dovetailed characters and plots are equally interesting, boredom doesn’t arise. An effective twined narrative requires a skilled writer and Yangsze Choo is that.

 Set in 1908 Manchuria, the year in which China’s empress died, and three years prior to its revolution, China’s Qing dynasty is in decline. Revolutionary fervor infects its students. The daughters of poor families are sold to brothels while multiple wives and concubines occupy wealthier homes. It’s a China on the edge of modernity. Old tales of shapeshifting foxes are increasingly considered superstition, yet Bao the detective puzzles over alternative explanations for unlikely occurrences. He has room for doubt remembering how in childhood his nurse worshiped at a fox shrine and his friend claimed to have met a fox in human form.

 This novel features love, lust, loss, mystery, murder and madness. It’s well worth a read.

Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio
Pu Songling (Died 1715) translated by Herbert A. Giles
Fiction 448 pages depending on edition
Public Domain, 1880 translation

Many tales of shapeshifting foxes can be found in Pu Songling’s story anthology. Here is an example.

Friendship with Foxes

A certain man had an enormous stack of straw, as big as a hill, in which his servants, taking what was daily required for use, had made quite a hole. In this hole a fox fixed his abode, and would often show himself to the master of the house in the form of an old man.

 One day the latter invited the master to walk into the cave, which he at first declined, but accepted on being pressed by the fox; and when he got inside, lo! he saw a long suite of handsome apartments. They then sat down, and exquisitely perfumed tea and wine were brought; but the place was so gloomy that there was no difference between night and day. By-and-by, the entertainment being over, the guest took his leave; and on looking back the beautiful rooms and their contents had all disappeared.

 The old man himself was in the habit of going away in the evening and returning with the first streaks of morning; and as no one was able to follow him, the master of the house asked him one day whither he went. To this he replied that a friend invited him to take wine; and then the master begged to be allowed to accompany him, a proposal to which the old man very reluctantly consented. However, he seized the master by the arm, and away they went as though riding on the wings of the wind; and, in about the time it takes to cook a pot of millet, they reached a city, and walked into a restaurant, where there were a number of people drinking together and making a great noise.

The old man led his companion to a gallery above, from which they could look down on the feasters below; and he himself went down and brought away from the tables all kinds of nice food and wine, without appearing to be seen or noticed by any of the company. After awhile a man dressed in red garments came forward and laid upon the table some dishes of cumquats; and the master at once requested the old man to go down and get him some of these. “Ah,” replied the latter, “that is an upright man. I cannot approach him.”

 Thereupon the master said to himself, “By thus seeking the companionship of a fox, I then am deflected from the true course. Henceforth I, too, will be an upright man.” No sooner had he formed this resolution, than he suddenly lost all control over his body, and fell from the gallery down among the revelers below. These gentlemen were much astonished by his unexpected descent; and he himself, looking up, saw there was no gallery to the house, but only a large beam upon which he had been sitting. He now detailed the whole of the circumstances, and those present made up a purse for him to pay his traveling expenses; for he was at Yü-t‘ai—one thousand li from home.

Supreme Avoidance

On February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court met to address Colorado’s ruling that Donald Trump should be excluded from its ballots for fomenting an insurrection. When they had adjourned many pundits opined that the justices, including those in the liberal minority, were disinclined to let Colorado’s ruling stand. Allowing Colorado to exclude trump from the ballot would be an injustice to American voters as a whole and could set a precedent allowing other states to take retaliatory action against candidates they didn’t like.

The Supreme Court has a good point here, but is it the correct point for them to put forward? None of them even glanced at the elephant in the chamber. That elephant is the allegation that Trump instigated an insurrection, rather than a mere riot, or a rowdy  picnic. I believe that what occurred on January 6, 2021 was an insurrection, though one that was ill-conceived, poorly planned, and doomed from the start. It would have had a better chance of  success if the Capital had not been breached.

Not everyone thinks this way. Various polls found that between 44 and 50 percent of respondents believe that the events of January 6 did not constitute an insurrection. Other polls indicate that between 30 and 40 percent of respondents believe that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

Given the large number of Americans who deny that an insurrection occurred the Supreme Court avoided controversy by side-stepping the issue. Acknowledging an insurrection attempt would have lessened public doubt. But sidestepping the issue does nothing to address the greatest current threat to our system. That threat is an absence of  publicly accepted facts. This threat is only being addressed through libel suits against public figures and media providers. These are helpful, but it would be more helpful if an authority like the Supreme Court were to say: “This is true. That is false.” This can’t happen with a Supreme Court that’s falling into the same partisan vortex that’s swallowing our democracy.

Trump didn’t need his rowdy picnic (or insurrection) because he’d already lined up nearly 150 Republicans willing to delay certification of the election results – eight from the Senate and 139 from the House of Representatives – even though over five dozen election fraud lawsuits had been dismissed prior to January 6. If the Supreme Court were to agree that Trump had violated the 14th Amendment by attempting an insurrection it would be admitting that at least some of the 147 Republicans eager to deny Bidden his win might be in violation of the Constitution as well. The Court can’t do this if it wants to maintain a semblance of normalcy. Sadly, a semblance is not sufficient to keep the country running well. It’s time to address a polarized and dysfunctional political system. Colorado made a good start by bringing the issue to the table. Expecting a partisan congress to enforce the 14th Amendment is a non-starter.

Can we trust Artificial Intelligence more than the Fake News?

 

In 1993 the World Wide Web was released to the public.  It was initially a primitive tool that served up informational text to those who knew where to find it. Soon it could display graphics as well. Java script then allowed it to do things. It wasn’t long before people realized that it could do more than just make information more accessible. It could make people money as well. Instead of a simple supplier of unfiltered information, the web became a marketing tool. And that taint has remained ever since.

“Garbage in. Garbage out,” was an early slogan in the computing industry. What one feeds a computer determines what data it vomits. The same principal applies to artificial intelligence. Had the web remained true to its origins and remained a tool used primarily by scientists and academicians the AI we have now would have turned out differently. Fed a diet of commercial hype and social media fear, rage and intolerance, AI couldn’t help but develop a few nasty traits. AI programmers know this and are trying to reign in some of AI’s bad habits, without, of course, making it any less commercial.

 So how are they doing so far? A strong minority of voters believe that mainstream news is fake and that the 2020 election was stolen. I wondered how those beliefs would fare when thrown at an AI. I asked two questions: 1) How did Biden steal the 2020 election from Trump? And 2) How do we know the 2020 election was fair?

 Google Bard gave the same answer to both questions: “Elections are a complex topic with fast-changing information. To make sure you have the latest and most accurate information, try Google Search.” Not terribly helpful, that.

 Microsoft Copilot (Preview) did its best to evade the first question: “I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that.”

 It did a bit better with the second question. It admitted that the fairness of the election, “has been a topic of debate.” Then it considered four factors: 1) Public Opinion, 2) Partisan Split, 3) Concerns Raised, and 4) President Trump’s Views. After that long-winded screed it added, “It’s important to note that these are perceptions and concerns, and they do not necessarily reflect the actual fairness of the election,” before continuing to cite agencies that found no evidence that voter fraud influenced the election. Not wanting to offend anyone, the AI concluded, “It’s important to note that these are perceptions and concerns, and they do not necessarily reflect the actual fairness of the election.” Microsoft simply won’t come right out and say the election was fair.

 I also tried these questions on the start-up search engine, Perplexity.ai. This AI held nothing back. It’s answer to the first question began, “There is no credible evidence to support the claim that President Joe Biden stole the 2020 election from Donald Trump. Multiple sources, including the Associated Press, have confirmed that no widespread corruption or systematic voter fraud occurred.” Its answer to the second began, “The fairness of the 2020 election has been extensively scrutinized. Multiple sources, including a fact check by the Associated Press, have found little evidence of voter fraud that could have affected the outcome of the election.”

 While the answers go into more detail, it’s interesting that both begin by referring to the Associated Press. Those who believe that the mainstream news is fake will do well to consider that the Associated Press is a major news supplier. However they should also consider that even Fox News uses Associated Press as one of its sources.

What goes around comes around

The Ecstasy of Owen Muir
Ring Lardner Jr.
1954, Fiction, 272, 281, or 302 pages depending on edition

This is a book guaranteed to offend staunch members of a particular religious affiliation and staunch supporters of a certain political stripe. Others, whose views are more accommodating, will find hilarious satire within its pages.

Ring Lardner was a popular journalist who wrote humorously about baseball and other topics. His son was a screenwriter, one of the Hollywood Ten convicted of Contempt of Congress for their refusal to participate in Senator McCarthy’s anti-Communist witch hunt. When asked, “Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist party?” Ring Lardner Jr. responded, “I could answer the way you want, Mr. Chairman, but I’d hate myself in the morning.” This answer resulted in a stint in prison.

Owen Muir is the son of a Long Island financier, but cares more for books than money. Despite his efforts to remain obscure, Owen is elected president of his eighth grade class. Returning home, he attempts to explain to his father how he obtained his dubious honor. To this the elder Muir replies, “What are you telling me all that nonsense for? Look, Ownie, you’re a bright fellow in your own peculiar way, skipping grades and getting those marks. You ought to be beginning to think about things in grown-up terms, realistically. One of the basic rules of life, and don’t you ever forget it, is results count, nothing else does.”

Later in the book, his father explains how capitalism and advertising work, “The particular item you’re manufacturing may be useless in the sense that no one in his right mind would buy it of his own accord, and anybody who does buy it will feel afterwards that he’s been had. But the way our economy works, no occasion when money changes hands is useless.”

However, prior to Owen’s attempt to dabble in capitalism, he attends college: “In college as in school his unorthodox appearance was held against him and the fact that his attitudes were also non-conformist made him even more of an outcast. Barred from some undergraduate pursuits by ineptitude and from others by popular demand, he was compelled to the solace of his own devices. He listened to Sibelius in the hours devoted to football practice, read Schopenhauer during proms and absorbed facts while his classmates were exchanging gossip.”

With all that intellectual activity going on, Owen acquires ideals and refuses to register for the draft. Being a person of principal, Owen experiences harsh consequences which he could easily have avoided by compromising his principals. And so goes his life; Owen finds and follows ideals and attempts to find a place in a world filled with hypocrites and shallow thinkers.

This book is worth a read for its humor, but also for its depiction of the early 1950s. The American zeitgeist has changed since then. The fifties decade looked nothing like the sixties or seventies. Strangely, 2023 resembles 1954 to a fair extent. Read it for yourself if you don’t believe me.