A miscellany of book reviews, rambles, opinions and outright lies
Dear Representative;
During the week Kirk was killed I heard an episode of “Today Explained.” In this Episode, “Trump’s chief culture warrior”, Noel King interviewed Christopher Rufo author of the book, “America's Cultural Revolution: How the Radical Left Conquered Everything.”
Everything conquered, Wow! So just who is the radical left? In his interview, Rufo talked about the Smithsonian and other institutions. They have been, “totally captured by left winged ideologies.”
Trans-genderism is an ideology according to Rufo – I consider it more of an identity, but Rufo insists. Historically, native American groups acknowledged three to five sexual identities or roles. Rufo insists there are only two sexes. However, different cultures have different views of such things.
Rufo also insists that that there are agreed upon aesthetic standards and that polemical art fails to meet those standards. Todays museums are “curators of anti-cultural nihilism” instead of acceptable art. While some say art can be political or have subjective appeal, Rufo claims this is not the case. Adolf Hitler had personal standards for acceptable art and imposed them on his fellow Germans. Perhaps Rufo would also like to do this.
In his book, Rufo claims that Herbert Marcuse promoted a plan for covertly indoctrinating the masses in socialist ideology. I was still in high school when Marcuse did this. That was more than five decades ago. I asked some lefties I know. Two had heard of Marcuse – none knew anything about him or his ideas. None had ever heard a college professor mention his name. However, the right leaning Cato institute mentions him in several of its articles. Apparently Cato considers his ideas a threat, or perhaps they’re enamored with his covert indoctrination plan.
I have a different theory. The radical left was a fringe movement during the 1960s and 1970s. They are no longer even that. No Democratic president since Lyndon Johnson has promoted policies to the left of his. In fact, Americans have been shifting to the right for half a century now. The radical left has left. They’ve marched off into a black hole. They’re so rare now that they can be considered cyrtids like Big Foot or Nessie. Some report seeing them, but there’s little proof that they actually exist.
Except in the minds of right-winged thinkers including Christopher Rufo and the Cato Institute.
Most Americans support Social Security and Medicare, yet both have been linked to socialism. Neither Social Security or Medicare meet actual definitions of socialism yet that hasn’t stopped some from so maligning those programs. Similarly, not all on the left can be considered radical. Few, in fact, can be. Yet that doesn’t stop some voices from demonizing imaginary enemies. This does great harm because it stifles the free expression of different views and useful dialogues. When all must think the same and blame imaginary enemies, social progress ceases. Dirty tricks beget soiled and spoiled societies.
As long as we do politics by blaming instead of cooperating we progress toward an Orwellian society.
If I told you to jump off a cliff you wouldn't do it — so why are you willing to jump off a (fiscal) cliff when Donald Trump tells you to? The dollar's value has dropped this year to an extent not seen in over 50 years. This will greatly increase the cost and difficulty of servicing our enormous national debt. And yet Congress is considering a Bad Bullshit Bill that will increase the deficit by 3.3 trillion dollars. There's no hiding this no matter how much magical math is used.
And speaking of magic — you argued on three prior occasions that tax breaks for the wealthy get pissed down the social ladder to rain abundance on average Joes. It didn't happen then. It won't happen now. Maybe you should stick with facts and logic instead of misinformation when you argue your points. We've known this was a lie for 40 years. If you pass this bill your voters will know as well. And then you'll get voted out of office — perhaps even ridden out of town on a rail. Good luck with all that.
Sincerely,
Voters with open eyes.
If you don’t like how things are going, contact your Congress person and Senator.
Merge and Disciple: Two Short Novels (From Crosstown to Oblivion) Kindle
Edition
Walter Mosley
Fiction 243 pages
Tor Books, 2012
Like Jumpnauts, these two short novels are concerned with what might occur if humans encountered an awarness greater than their own. In all three works the consequences are planet changing but the stories themselves are very different.
Walter Mosley is best known for his crime and detective fiction. His heroes, Easy Rawlins, King Oliver, and others walk the thin edge that separates morality from immorality. Mosley heroes are driven by moral considerations and behavior, and that’s just as true for the protagonists in Merge and Disciple. These two works, are science fiction in the best sense, but they also waft a bit of eau de detective noir. Mosley’s characters passage between mundane and enhanced consciousness is tempered with violence, pain and uncertainty. Fair warning: graphic sexual scenes may be disturbing to those more used to traditional vanilla science fiction.
Mosley writes in contemporary style, but with sufficient lyricality to lift his prose above the commonplace. In his book, This Year You Write Your Novel, he stresses that those wanting to write prose fiction should first become familiar with poetry. “Of all writing, the discipline in poetry is the most demanding. You have to learn how to distill what you mean into the most economic and at the same time the most elegant and accurate language.” Mosley has the skills to use words with economy, fitness and purpose.
From Merge: “You killed me,” I said with no emotion, vibration, or intention. “That’s like a table complaining about being dusted,” she said, “a sheet worrying about being hung out to dry.”
From Disciple: Nothing is as it seems, friend Hogarth. Nothing in the world that human beings believe in is really what exists. There was no primal atom, no Big Bang. There is no space as such. Life is not unique. There is no Not God.
 |
| Get the button |
I've shared my views with Congressmen and Senators on a good few occasions. But recently when a friend asked me to contact my representatives I was reluctant to do so. These days I feel like no one is listening, or if they're listening, they're failing to act. I asked why should I bother to contact my representatives when they won't listen? In the end, I made the calls. An intern for one of my representatives assured me that she was listening. But I fear other people's representatives are not. They like what the administration does and so do their constituents.
Trump ignores rules and foregoes established procedures and lawmakers don't challenge him. He attempts to revoke birthright citizenship, is brutal with immigrants, and claims that merit should substitute for diversity, equity and inclusion. In his world, merit is something white men have and sometimes loan to white women. In his world, non-white candidates only get hired when standards are purposely lowered, never because of merit.
Trump has banned all reference to DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) in government agencies and ended DEI initiatives. Several sources have suggested that DEI training may not always achieve its ends. In 2016, the Harvard Business Review reported that some DEI efforts have actually worsened workplace equality. Those who voluntarily engage in diversity training shift their views, while those who feel forced into training may harden their views against it. Engaging workers to promote diversity works well, while coercing them to do so worsens workplace equity.
So does that mean we should do away with DEI entirely? I don't think so. One can't change a person who doesn't want to change, but other people seek out self-improvement, and a best means of self-improvement is learning and challenging one's biases. The current effort to do away with DEI really promotes a hidden message. That message is that a certain group of people — white men — has traditionally held the most power in the USA and should continue to do so — especially if it keeps others from enjoying the same comforts and privileges.
This message ignores that American values represent those of a conglomerate of peoples and cultures. An America that becomes uniform, inequitable and exclusive is not an America in which most Americans will thrive. It's not the America I want. Do you?
